Environmental Law

RECENT POSTS

Property Needs Environmental Cleanup? Don’t Scrap It, SCAP It!

Attorney Stephen T. Holzer

Stephen T. Holzer | Shareholder

August 9, 2017

Property owners in California may have access to state funds for environmental cleanup of smaller brownfields projects. The money comes from two pieces of environmental legislation passed in 2014. The Proposition 1 Groundwater Sustainability Program

Read More

Environmental Law: H.R. 2936 a Solution to Fire-borrowing?

Attorney Stephen T. Holzer

Stephen T. Holzer | Shareholder

July 14, 2017

Environmental Litigation Stephen T. Holzer 818.907.3299 The federal House Natural Resources Committee (HNRC) recently passed H.R. 2936, a bill to improve the overall health of forests and other lands across the country. The bill was

Read More

Prop 65 Update: The Rules They Are a Changin’

Attorney Stephen T. Holzer

Stephen T. Holzer | Shareholder

January 3, 2017

Environmental Litigation Stephen T. Holzer 818.907.3299 Proposition 65, known as the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, among other things requires businesses employing ten or more people to warn consumers if the

Read More

California Ballot 2016: Pros and Cons of Props 62-67

Attorney Stephen T. Holzer

Stephen T. Holzer | Shareholder

September 16, 2016

Environmental Litigation by  Stephen T. Holzer 818.907.3299 This is part three of our ongoing series, California Ballot 2016, summarizing each of the 17 state-wide measures voters will encounter on the November ballot. Click these links: Props

Read More

Supreme Court Tells EPA Cost Does Matter

Attorney Stephen T. Holzer

Stephen T. Holzer | Shareholder

August 10, 2015

Environmental Litigation by Stephen T. Holzer 818.907.3299 The Environmental Protection Agency’s Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) placed national limits on mercury and other toxic emissions from power plants. The agency projected MATS to prevent

Read More

Proposition 48: A North Fork in the Road for Tribal Casinos

Attorney Stephen T. Holzer

Stephen T. Holzer | Shareholder

October 31, 2014

by Stephen T. Holzer 818.907.3299 Continuing our series on the 2014 California election ballot, we now turn to Proposition 48, the Referendum on Indian Gaming Compacts. If voters approve the referendum November 4th, Native American

Read More

SEARCH

CATEGORIES

disclaimer

This Blog/Web Site is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only, to provide general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

© 2024 Lewitt Hackman. All rights reserved. | Attorney Disclaimer | Privacy Policy Site design by ONE400Opens in a new window
x
x

Error: Contact form not found.