California to Invalidate Out of State Non-Compete Agreements

Headshot of attorney for employers, Tal Yeyni

Tal Burnovski Yeyni | Shareholder

September 13, 2023
Headshot of Josh Stein

Joshua S. Stein | Associate

September 13, 2023

A new California law (Senate Bill 699) expands a prohibition on non-compete agreements beyond state lines.

Current law (Business and Professions Code Section 16600), provides that every contract that restrains anyone from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business of any kind is, to that extent, void, except under limited statutory exceptions (e.g., when a person sells the goodwill of a business or ownership interest). 

SB 699, which adds section 16600.5 to the Business and Professions Code, expands this prohibition to any non-compete provisions regardless of where and when the contract was signed. This means that out-of-state employers cannot enforce non-compete contracts in California, even though they were lawfully entered into in a different jurisdiction. This also manifests in the state legislature’s declaration regarding the basis for SB 699:  

California has a strong interest in protecting the freedom of movement of persons whom California-based employers wish to employ to provide services in California, regardless of the person’s state of residence. This freedom of employment is paramount to competitive business interests.

As further deterrence against non-compete restrictions, SB 699 provides that current, former, or prospective employees have:

  • A private right of action for injunctive relief, and/or
  • Recovery of actual damages, and a
  • Right to recover reasonable attorney’s fees and costs if the employee prevails.

Non-compete restrictions are not limited to California. Recently, the Federal Trade Commission proposed a rule seeking to ban non-compete agreements throughout the United States.

The FTC’s proposed rule would make it illegal for an employer to enter into or attempt to enter into:

  • A non-compete with a worker;
  • Maintain a noncompete with a worker; or
  • Represent that the worker is subject to a noncompete.

This proposed rule would apply to all workers and require employers to (1) rescind existing non-compete agreements and (2) actively inform workers they are no longer in effect. While the FTC originally held an open comment period through April 19, 2023, it postponed the final vote until April 2024.

Tal Burnovski Yeyni and Joshua S. Stein are employment defense attorneys.




This Blog/Web Site is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only, to provide general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

© 2024 Lewitt Hackman. All rights reserved. | Attorney Disclaimer | Privacy Policy Site design by ONE400Opens in a new window

Error: Contact form not found.